CR 31 Union Chu over Pataula Creek
Randolph County, Georgia · rated Good in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory
United States Bridge Conditions2025 National Bridge Inventory, FHWACompiled
- CR 31 Union Chu over Pataula Creek in Randolph County, Georgia, is rated in good condition in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory (as of ).
- Its lowest-rated component is the deck, rated 7 (good condition) on the 0-9 scale.
- It was built in 1972 and reconstructed in 2002, making it 53 years old at the 2025 inventory.
- It carries about 350 vehicles a day (traffic count year 2024).
- Its listed owner is the county highway agency.
- It is one of 45 of the 51 inventoried bridges in Randolph County rated good (88.2%); 0 (0.0%) are rated poor.
- A good rating means every major component - deck, superstructure, substructure, or culvert - is rated 7 or higher on FHWA's 0-9 scale: no more than minor problems.
View this bridge on a map → (31.84848, -84.90211)
Component ratings
| Component | Rating (2025) | FHWA scale meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Deck | 7 | Good condition |
| Superstructure | 7 | Good condition |
| Substructure | 7 | Good condition |
Bridge details
| Structure | Prestressed concrete channel beam |
| Length | about 399 ft |
| Location | 1.5 Mi NW of Springvale |
| NBI structure number | 000000024350090 |
| Condition class | Good |
Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2025 data as reported by the Georgia department of transportation.
Busiest bridges in Randolph County
| Bridge | Built | Vehicles/day | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| US 27/ SR 1 over CSX Railroad | 2015 | 25,500 | Good |
| US 27 Sbl / SR 1 over Town Branch | 1994 | 22,600 | Good |
| US 82- SR 41 over L. Ichawaynochaway Creek | 1995 | 4,130 | Good |
| US 82 / SR 50 over Town Branch | 1935 | 4,120 | Good |
| US 27 Nbl / SR 1 over Town Branch | 1994 | 3,430 | Good |
| US82 / SR 50 over Pachitla Creek | 2007 | 3,380 | Good |
All bridges nearby: Randolph County, GA bridge conditions · every bridge in Randolph County · Georgia bridges.
Background: how bridge ratings work · what "poor" and "structurally deficient" actually mean · how often bridges are inspected.